The Numerical Phallic Order

      The Numerical Phallic Logic  

​​​

There was once a world populated by beings who lived in relation to the Phallus. They did so unconsciously—most were unaware that such a structure even operated behind their lives. The Phallus was not just a symbol, but an embodiment of virility, capacity, success, and triumph. It was the Ideal. The Emperor himself.

The phallic numerical structure worked through a simple scale, numbers from 1 to 10. Those who functioned at level 5 and below—4, 3, 2, 1—related to one another easily. Their interactions weren’t governed by envy. The 5s were average, indistinguishable from one another, ordinary in their abilities. A grey mass. Those who functioned below 5 blended into this crowd without difficulty; they were relatable, non-performative, and non-threatening.

But those who functioned above 5—6s, 7s, 8s, 9s, and 10s were different. They found it difficult to relate to the lower spectrum. They were usually excluded from the spaces governed by 5s and below. And not because they didn’t want to belong, but because they triggered something in others. Envy. Those who functioned above 6 were often forced into solitude. It wasn’t that they couldn’t build social circles—they could have, easily—but the envy of the 5s and below pushed them to the periphery.

Above 6, the world was different. A 6 could meet an 8 or a 10, and instead of competition, there was mutual recognition. A nod. A smile. A silent homage. They were outcasts—ostracised for beauty, intelligence, confidence, and uniqueness. But outcasts who respected one another. They didn’t envy upward—they honoured.

The enjoyment dynamics split here, too. The 1-to-5 crowd enjoyed inclusively, through relation, togetherness, and the simplicity of sameness. It wasn’t phallic enjoyment, but a soft, universal one. In contrast, the 6-to-10s enjoyed phallically: they pursued, performed, achieved, and conquered. Their enjoyment was tied to their capacities.

Yet, because the 6s and above were excluded early in life, as children, they often didn’t understand why they were attacked or rejected. All they knew was that something about them provoked others. Over time, this became a kind of sweet anger—a quiet strength, an inner fire—directed at the 5s who would never escape that space. What had once been a perceived weakness revealed itself as pure potential. They had been powerful all along—the intellect had simply not yet matured enough to grasp it.

​​

​

Sexuation and Schoolyard Power

​

Girls who functioned above 6—those with beauty, softness, early development, or striking femininity—were bullied, assaulted, and mocked by envious girls who functioned at 5 and below. The unlucky majority oppressed the fortunate few.

Boys who were 6 and above were despised by the other boys, especially because they were successful with girls, particularly those at 6 and above. Phallic signification attracts phallic signification. Meanwhile, the 5s and below—those who weren’t comfortable in their sexuality, who lacked attention, who weren’t good-looking or intellectually sharp—attacked the performative boys out of envy. These boys became outsiders, laughed at and shunned by the universal mass.

None of them—neither the envious nor the envied—knew what was really happening. The agents of this social theatre were unaware of the true force behind their scripts. The true agent, always operating silently, was the Phallus—the signifier behind the theatre of consciousness and identity.

Those who functioned at 5 and below didn’t understand what triggered them so violently when a 6 or above entered the scene. What they felt was rage or shame. What they saw was a threat. But what was truly occurring was compensatory envy: an unconscious attempt to destroy what one lacks but secretly desires.

Since no one had psychoanalytic knowledge, especially not in childhood, the field remained vague, oppressive, and misunderstood. But the phallic mechanism kept running in the background like a silent engine.

​

​

The Eternal Split: To Have It or To Be It

​

The split perpetuated endlessly: those who have it—and go for it because they can—and those who don’t have it, and so work tirelessly to castrate the ones who do.

Those at 5 and below wanted to enjoy the world the way the 6s and above did, but they couldn’t. So they compensated by attacking them. And in doing so, they got their own twisted version of phallic enjoyment—not the joy of power, but the joy of destroying power. A negative phallic enjoyment. The enjoyment of envy.

It is the same dynamic that drives the "male feminist" who sides with envious women, not because of true solidarity, but because he cannot stand among other men. It is a structural envy masked as ideology.

The 6s and above simply wanted to live, create, perform, and enjoy their abilities. But those who couldn’t match that energy had to intervene—had to castrate. The structure is clear: the victim is born from the realm of 5 and below, and the performer is born from 6 and above. One seeks sameness, the other seeks singularity.

Eventually, those born capable began to realise what had happened. All the preaching about “not standing out,” about “being humble,” was a disguised attack. What was really being said was: “We are jealous. You have what we lack. Your phallic signification hurts us. We want to castrate you.”

​

​

The Phallic Olympics and the Growth of Society

​

As time passed, the split deepened. Those who were capable sought more. Those who weren’t envied, protested, and criticised. The divide became ideological: those who identified with having it (the performative, the particular, the ambitious) versus those who identified with being it (the universal, the passive, the dependent).

The former dressed sharply, worked hard, and pursued excellence. The latter preferred a world without distinctions—a world where everything was shared, where nothing exceeded the average.

Governments were run by performers—those once bullied for their capacities had become leaders. They governed with order, with performance, with ambition. But they had to make concessions for those who couldn’t keep up. The Emperor understood this. So he produced a system: those below 6 would be given psychotherapy and medication. Psychotherapy would help them accept their structural role. Medication would mute their suffering and help them function.

Of course, not everyone understood this logic. So another step was taken: pharmaceutical corporations and the state colluded to mass-produce a chemical illusion—antidepressants, antipsychotics, mood stabilisers—designed to allow the 5s and below to exist. These substances killed their desire to perform and gave birth to a new illusion: a belief that the system- capitalist order itself—was the enemy.

A new intellectual delusion was born, rooted in envy, disguised as critique.

​

​

Peaceful Protests of the Passive Mass

​

The 5s and below are organised. Victims assembled in groups: marginalised identities, oppressed collectives, people who demanded equality not out of capacity, but out of inability. Those above 6 had to deal with it. The solution? More production. More medication. More diagnostic identities to explain the structural envy and offer relief through symbolic victimhood.

Psychologists and philosophers, trying to account for this split, attempted to deconstruct the phallic structure itself. Some claimed: “The Phallus isn’t real. It’s imaginary. Let’s all just live together in peace.”

But the signifier never sleeps.

Sexuation: Entitled vs. Unentitled

Those integrated into the 5-and-below structure felt entitled. Their sameness gave them a sense of belonging—they identified with being it. This is the feminine position: not having the Phallus, but being it—and demanding symbolic protection. In family life, it's the daughter protected by the father. In society, it's the citizen who expects the government to be their surrogate father.

This structure produces passive populations—people who demand from the symbolic Father.

Those who functioned at 6 and above felt unentitled. Their difference alienated them from the crowd, but it also pushed them toward achievements. They identified with having it, the masculine position, which doesn't wait for protection—it builds its own.

Both structures depend on the Emperor. The one who is it believes everything should be given. The one who has it knows it must be earned.

​

Liberalism and Conservatism: The Flatulence and the Poop

​

This system also splits into a political metaphor: liberals and conservatives.

Liberalism is like flatulence—a smelly wind. It disperses into the air, relaxed, passive, non-confrontational. It signals lack, but with a shrug. “We’re all smelly. Let’s just be smelly together.”

Conservatism is like poop—a hard, formed, smelly object. Still a lack. Still a unary trait. But one that takes form, structure, diet, and digestion. It’s the difference between a casual fart and a disciplined bowel movement.

Both stink—but one accepts it, the other does something with it.

The essence lies in how they relate to their lack. Those aligned with being it are okay with their limitations—they ask society to accommodate them. Those aligned with having it seek to overcome, prove, and particularise their lack into something meaningful.